Common mistakes in ESG reporting

In recent times, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting has emerged as a crucial facet for companies and organisations. As sustainability regulations become more stringent and stakeholders clamor for increased transparency and accountability, many entities are stepping up to report on their social, environmental, and governance impacts. However, in this endeavor, several common missteps often rear their heads, undermining the effectiveness and credibility of ESG reports. Here are some of the most frequent errors that diminish the value of an ESG report.

  • Lack of Board and Executive Leadership Involvement: ESG reporting should be championed by top leadership. When senior management is not fully engaged, it can result in inadequate resource allocation and a lack of commitment to meaningful change.
  • Lack of Materiality Assessment: Failure to identify and prioritise the most relevant ESG issues for the organisation and its stakeholders can result in reports that don’t provide a clear picture of the organisation’s true impact.
  • Selective Reporting: Focusing solely on positive ESG aspects while downplaying or omitting negative impacts can lead to a skewed representation of the organisation’s performance. A comprehensive report should address both strengths and weaknesses. This may even lead to ”greenwashing,” which refers to the practice of making unsubstantiated or misleading claims about a company’s environmental efforts or sustainability practices. Greenwashing undermines the credibility of ESG reporting and can erode trust with stakeholders.
  • Failure to Integrate ESG into Business Strategy: Treating ESG reporting as a standalone activity rather than integrating it into the core business strategy can limit its effectiveness in driving positive change.
  • Short-Term Focus: ESG efforts should be integrated into long-term business strategies. Overemphasising short-term gains without considering the long-term impact can undermine the organisation’s overall sustainability goals.
  • Lack of Data Accuracy and Verification: One of the most significant mistakes is not ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data used in the report. Inaccurate or unverified data can lead to misrepresentations of the organisation’s ESG performance.

To avoid these common mistakes, organisations should prioritise transparency, accurate data collection, stakeholder engagement (including employees, investors, customers, and local communities), and a genuine commitment to incorporating ESG principles into their business operations. Seeking guidance from established reporting frameworks (such as ESRS, IFRS, GRI) and regularly reviewing and updating reporting practices can also help improve the quality and impact of ESG reporting.

Even a well-prepared ESG report may not have the desired impact if it is not effectively communicated to stakeholders. So don’t forget to communicate internally as well and encourage the use of the report as a tool in sales, communications, marketing, and HR.

Hanna Liappis, Sustainable Business Advisor, Taigawise Ltd.

Require assistance in initiating sustainability reporting or commencing responsible practices? Feel free to reach out to us!